Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Most likely not, since most lumberjacks do not carry their axes generally around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence took place in a town bar in Fontaniva, Italy, in which a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video streaming internet sites, where people can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing off vapor, the machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but maybe not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this is an indication of victory, or a show of friendship towards these particular machines. When working with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all of the time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete lot of money. He’s a laborer and only works any now and then.’ Apparently, this might be one worker whom keeps his own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally a very man that is quiet. He just stepped in https://myfreepokies.com/more-chilli-slot-review/ extremely calmly with an axe and smashed all the machines. There had been a few customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
As a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the man was sentenced for half a year for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon. But jail overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The 2nd of these two tales is a bit more terrifying, since the axe was wielded maybe not during the slots, but at a member of the employees at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting store in Cardiff ‘in circumstances of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with a few cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or even worse if he didn’t comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm on the night of the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant with all the tree-chopping tool.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police called a ‘quantity of money,’ and the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven with a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up on the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While each and every of the three certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has had its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight throughout the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposal that would put a casino in the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal option is associated with the concept that neighboring communities is afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have the opportunity to vote on whether those casinos must be opened in the beginning. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, was one of a handful of prospects whom have suggested that most of Boston should have the ability to vote on a casino that could be situated in East Boston, for instance.
When it comes towards the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on it is unfair to the surrounding communities. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it could have on many Boston communities.
‘The Wynn proposal had been voted…on in only one community,’ Conley stated during a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social receive none of the proposed benefits.’
Based on the state laws that produced the opportunity for three new casinos in Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not to allow the projects to be built. However, casino designers are required to negotiate compensation, with arbitration needed in the event that casinos and governments that are localn’t visited an answer on their own.
Conley has proposed taking a path that is not really outlined in the 2011 casino law regarding the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while nevertheless giving East Boston veto power throughout the vote that is entire. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the whole city to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents found that 44% had been and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Regardless if voters return these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by their state once the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, additionally there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising celebrity of the UK’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the activities book cookie jar after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired leading activities company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a gambling store critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.
Since Gala Coral Group is one associated with the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the united states- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the local streets of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’
‘I understand there is huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with wagering shops and payday loan companies that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna claims?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says one thing in public places and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that’s very uncommon for a politician.
Spared for a Technicality
But, fighting back in the corner of this Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna stated that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a personal capacity, and was accepted in respect using the rules and correctly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the office of Chuka Umunna in his capability as Shadow Secretary of State for company, and for staffing,’ so it does officially pass as legitimate.
Even though Goulden is not head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether this is a entirely innocent contribution or not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party may just be searching to destroy the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using this type of difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their local constituency.
‘ The thing that is only know he undoubtedly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ advertised Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is thought to be described as a future Labour Party leader, has already experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this season their workplace had been accused of modifying his Wikipedia page showing evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.